Love
I've got a lot on my mind these days. New concerns. New friends. The world ticking down like a schizophrenic clock to redemption and armageddon, grief and mania all at once. The possibility of love. The verity of hate. Truth and consequences, the "or" taken out of everything.
I watched Charlie Kirk's murder over and over. I watched Iryna Zarutska's murder over and over. An ex-Marine said, "If you're taking public transit, just don't sit down." I repeated this to a co-worker and he nodded at the wisdom of it. But you can acknowledge wisdom and affirm that you're never, in any minute of all the days between this moment and the cessation of your pulse, going to practice it.
My co-worker will sit because he's tired at the end of the day; there's no parking downtown; and, like all of us, he often takes the bus. I like him very much and I hope he never has to regret sitting in front of an insane man with a folding knife. I would have hoped that for Iryna Zarutska, too. I'd hope that for anyone.
My drama is far less compelling, thankfully. Last night I had a sore throat and sinus cold. Every time I lay down in bed, I felt like I was suffocating. I finally said, "Fine. There's reading I can be doing. There's tea I can be drinking. There's the novel draft like digging a tunnel through the center of the earth with a spoon. There's morning Zazen. There's the sun coming up while I sit and wonder about the ratio of cups of coffee to workday hours." And as I said, so it came to pass.
Neem Karoli Baba (aka, "Maharaji"), Ram Dass' guru is famous for saying, "Love everyone and always tell the truth." As much as I've enjoyed reading Ram Dass' books and listening to his lectures, I've mostly been a student of the "Paying back is a virtue" school of ethical compensation with a little "It's impossible to love everyone and you shouldn't try" thrown in for flavor. But lately, I've been rethinking this.
Given the high weirdness and unpleasantness of the news, I've begun to think that one either loves everyone or no one. There's no halfsies possible, since there is no objective basis for who we choose to love. We're actually not in control of that—no "or," no meaningful choice there, either. We love who we love. We like who we like. And our greatest deepest loves, like our greatest deepest hatreds, must always be ever-unfolding mysteries. But is there a way to love more, to reach the ideal such that, at least for now, we're a bit less hypocritical in our preferences?
Sometimes, the hardest person to love is ourselves, since the enigma of the self is the deepest puzzle of all. Like a tide pool, it has layers that stretch down into our being. Like a bottomless pit, it can be terrifying. And yet we have to go exploring down there. At some point, we have to look in the mirror and say, "I love you" or "I hate you" and stick to that. We can't say, "I love you now, but I'll hate you later" because, as Maharaji says, we also have to tell the truth.
In Polishing the Mirror, Ram Dass writes about being angry:
I said to [Maharaji], “Well, you told me to tell the truth, and the truth is I don’t love everyone.” He leaned close to me—like nose to nose and eye to eye—and very fiercely he said, “Love everyone and tell the truth.”
I started to say, “But …” and at that point the whole rest of that sentence became self-evident to me. He was saying, “When you finish being who you think you are, this is who you will be.” I was thinking I was somebody who couldn’t love everyone and tell the truth. He was saying, “Well, when you give that one up, I am still here, and the game is very simple. Love everyone and tell the truth." . . . I saw that the only reason I got angry was because I was holding on to how I thought it was supposed to be.
I am not as wise as Ram Dass. I can say I don't believe I'm somebody who can love everyone. But the only non-hypocritical alternative—to hate everyone—is perhaps even more impossible for me. Maybe I haven't traveled down into the layers of my inner tide pool far enough. Maybe admitting this is the only way to at least tell the truth as I understand it right now.
Lately, I have been hanging out with a group of librarians, some of the kindest, sweetest well-meaning people I’ve known in a long time. They're setting a powerful example for me. But, around them, I often feel like a Russian in the synagogue, like my inner darkness could never make it possible for me to be like that and still express my truth.
This morning, I practiced Zazen at sunrise. I quietly chanted the Heart Sutra, which I have not done in a long time, for Iryna Zarutska and Charlie Kirk, not because of who they were or who they weren't, but because a Zen master once said to me, "Maybe, in another life, I am you and you are me."
It's entirely possible. Maybe, when I finish being who I think I am, I'll be able to say whether I believe that or not. Who will I be then? Maybe I will be Iryna Zarutska or Charlie Kirk or you.